Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1293

reference
827-tree-1
name
1293
tree-preservation-order

undefined

827-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.044824 50.870367)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.044781 50.870362,-1.044783 50.870370,-1.044789 50.870378,-1.044798 50.870384,-1.044810 50.870388,-1.044823 50.870389,-1.044836 50.870388,-1.044858 50.870379,-1.044864 50.870371,-1.044866 50.870363,-1.044864 50.870354,-1.044858 50.870347,-1.044849 50.870341,-1.044837 50.870337,-1.044824 50.870335,-1.044799 50.870340,-1.044789 50.870346,-1.044783 50.870354,-1.044781 50.870362)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL